beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for six months, respectively.
However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A was the person who was the head of Gangwon-do Branch D from 2008 to 2013, and Defendant B was the person who was working for the G of the Gangwon-do Advertising Association branches in the name of "F" in Gangwon-do E.
1. The Defendants’ co-principaled Defendant A conspiredd to take charge of related construction works in the said branch in consultation with the Plaintiff’s affiliated organizations, instead of paying the self-charges in consultation with the Plaintiff’s affiliated organizations, in order to maintain the illegal advertisements of the district and to maintain the signboards, and to take charge of the relevant construction works in the said branch in the proportion of 80% subsidies from the Do/Gun, 20% subsidies from the Do/Gun, 31 October 31, 2007 to December 31, 2008, a project period of 20% from 31, 2008 to 41 December 31, 2008.
Defendant
A around October 27, 2008, at the Human-Gun Office of Gangwon-do, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, 349-6, the Plaintiff paid KRW 27,925,000 to the said Promotion Committee in the name of the said Promotion Committee. It is paid KRW 111,546,00 of the subsidy. After preparing an application for the subsidy for installation of beautiful signboards to the purport that the depositee would have paid KRW 111,546,00 in the name of the said Promotion Committee, it was accompanied by a detailed statement of passbook transaction with the name of 53 residents as if the depositee collected by the residents He et al. of the village, and submitted it to the economic city and I, and it was remitted from the victim on December 10, 2008.
However, in fact, the above contributions were collected by Defendant B from 8 companies belonging to the above Gangwon-do Advertising Association Association's affiliated branch and deposited in the name of 53 village residents. The village residents did not pay the contributions at all.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim and acquired 111,546,00 won as a subsidy from the victim.
2. Defendant A is the defendant at the victim restraint group D.