1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant (appointed parties) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Defendant”) is the head of the Residents’ Self-Governing Council of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council of the so-called “J” on the H and I ground of the Gangnam-gu Seoul, and the Appointed G is the Chairperson, the Appointed C is the Vice-Chairperson, the Selected E, and the F is its members.

B. In around 2005, the Selected G paid and secured the key money for the joint wholesale market in J (hereinafter “instant joint wholesale market”) located adjacent to the J Self-Governing Council, and had the Plaintiff, the head of the previous youth’s department L operate the said joint wholesale market. The instant joint wholesale market was used by the Selection C by drawing electricity from the power supply line, which was applied for the use by the Selection C for the purpose of use in the Residents’ Self-Governing Council.

C. Around July 7, 2009, the Selected C had the Plaintiff’s husband L to be an addressee and supplied electricity used at the instant joint wholesale market in the name of the Selection C on the condition of public use at the Residents’ Self-Governing Council. Since the Residential Self-Governing Council was removed and the joint wholesale market was an individual business place other than its affiliated building, the Selection C sent a certificate of content to the effect that it would not interfere with the business of notifying the electrical circuit by July 14, 2009.

After that, around 17:20 on July 15, 2009, at the direction of the Selection C, the Defendant, the Selection D, and F cut the cable to supply electricity to the joint wholesale market using the cutting devices even though the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff expressed their intent to object to the cutting measures, “I am full of the payment,” and “I am full of the payment, if I take legal responsibility for the cutting measures, I am full of the payment,” and “I am full of the payment, if I am full of the payment, I am full of the payment, after I am full of the payment, I am full of the payment.”

In addition, the defendant, the designated parties D, and F committed an act of interfering with the business that could not seem to be seen by the inspection of the signboard of the instant joint market on July 31, 2009.