(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.11.25 2013가단50495

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.11.25 2013가단50495

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Defendant (Appointed Party), Appointed C, D, E, and F shall be KRW 3,00,000,000 for each Plaintiff, and the amount shall be from July 15, 2009.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Defendant”) and Selection Party G, C, D, E, and F are officers, etc. of the residents’ self-governing council of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H and I’s so-called “J” (the appointed Party G at the time of the instant case, the chairperson, the appointed Party C, the Vice-Chairperson C, the appointed Party D, the head of the youth department, the appointed Party E, and the F) and the Plaintiff operated a joint market that had been secured by G from next to the residents’ self-governing council of the residents’ self-governing council of Korea with business rights prior to its operation.

B. The J is divided into the so-called Village Self-Governing Council and the Residents' Self-Governing Council from the progress of the redevelopment plan, and there is a serious conflict between the residents.

On July 15, 2009, the Defendant and the Selection C, D, E, and F sent a certificate to the Plaintiff stating that “the right to block the supply to the joint market.” With respect to the use of electricity applied and supplied in the name of the Selection C before on the condition of public use by the Residents’ Self-Governing Council, the center was removed, and the joint market was an individual business place of the Plaintiff, not its affiliated building, so continuing to supply electricity is a breach of the contract with the Han River and the amount exceeded the capacity due to the electric use of the joint market is imposed.

Afterwards, at around 17:20 on July 15, 2009, Defendant, Appointors D, E, and F, at the direction of the Selection C, puted down to the joint market, and agreed that the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff would be given notice of certification of the above content to K, and that K would be “I will turn off the payment.” Accordingly, K would be “I would be asked why you will see why we will be able to take legal responsibility for the electric measures, and if you will be able to take legal responsibility for the electric measures, I would turn off the electric wires supplied electricity to the joint market by using the cut devices.”

(hereinafter referred to as “instant subdivision”). C.

Defendant.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.22 2015나13873

-의정부지방법원 2014.11.03 2014고단1395

-서울남부지방법원 2017.11.16 2017노273

-의정부지방법원 2015.04.27 2014고단1395 (1)

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.08 2014고정1485