Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around May 16, 2008, the Defendant forged private documents using a computer in the “D Judicial scrivener office” office located at Seocho-si, Seocho-si, Seoul: E: A person who created the right to collateral security: A and indication of the subject matter: F at the beginning of the beginning of the beginning of the building in Gangwon-do and the second floor neighborhood living facilities of the 2nd floor building built of reinforced concrete concrete structure: the Defendant affixed a seal imprint on E’s name, which was kept in custody on the back of the name.

In addition, the Defendant forged four copies of the mortgage contract in the name of E, a private document concerning rights and duties, for the purpose of exercising them over four times in total, such as the list of crimes in attached Form.

2. On May 16, 2008, the Defendant: (a) at the office of “D Judicial Scriveners” as described in paragraph (1) above, the Defendant used a forged mortgage contract form with a total of four times as shown in the attached list of crimes, as if it was duly formed to a staff who could not know the name of the said certified judicial scrivener office, who knew of the forgery.

3. On May 16, 2008, the Defendant entered false records, such as public electromagnetic records, into a forged mortgage contract at the office of the above "D judicial scrivener" as described in paragraph (1) of the same Article, and had G of a certified judicial scrivener G prepare an application form for registration of establishment of a mortgage on the second floor reinforced concrete structure, F, and 2 lots of land, and submit it to Chuncheon District Court for machines such as early support, etc.

Accordingly, the registered public official who is unaware of the circumstances has input the registration of the establishment of a neighboring establishment to E in the register of the real estate in question.

In addition, the defendant made a false report to a public official four times in total as shown in the attached list of crimes, and made a false report to record the fact on the electronic records in the same electronic records as the original of the notarial deed.

4. Events such as false statements and electromagnetic records; and