The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the president of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Private Teaching Institutes, and the victim H(n, 17 years old) is the original student of the above private teaching institute.

1. On May 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed indecent act by compulsion; (b) at the president’s room from around 19:00 to around 20:30 on May 16, 2013, the Defendant committed indecent act by compulsion by compulsion.

The defendant, following the victim's two arms, was at the end of the victim's chest because the victim's neck was at the end of his own arms, and the defendant contacted his arms.

As a result, the defendant committed an indecent act against a child or juvenile victim by force.

2. On May 18, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed indecent acts by compulsion; (b) at the president’s room from around 10:00 to around 12:00 on May 18, 2013, the Defendant committed indecent acts by compulsion by compulsion; and (c) at the president’s room from around 10:0 to around 12:0, the Defendant

The defendant, following the victim's two arms, was at the end of the victim's chest because the victim's neck was at the end of his own arms, and the defendant contacted his arms.

As a result, the defendant committed an indecent act against a child or juvenile victim by force.

3. On May 24, 2013, the Defendant committed indecent act by compulsion at the lower court’s room around May 2013, 2013, with the intent of reporting the victim’s overcoming the problem at the lower court’s room.

Although the Defendant stated in the indictment that he would be aware of the victim, the Defendant committed “hert and hert,” the summary of evidence after the Defendant’s “a summary of evidence” is acknowledged as having committed an indecent act by the victim. As such, even if the Defendant changed the content of the Defendant’s indecent act, it does not infringe the identity of the facts charged and does not cause any substantial disadvantage to the Defendant’s exercise of the Defendant’s right to defense (the Defendant stated that he/she committed an act on the upper part of the victim’s et al. and the hert and so on). However, without any amendment to the indictment, it is recognized ex officio as above without following the amendment process.

2.2.3