logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.06.09 2016고단504
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle CK7 vehicle in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (i.e., an escape vehicle) and the Road Traffic Act (ii).

On March 14, 2016, around 07:40 around Pyeongtaek-siD, the Defendant continued to drive at an insular speed, one lane from the E-distance from the slope of the Posi to the E-distance.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to view the front side and the left side, to accurately operate the operation and steering gear, and to maintain a safe distance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and stopped in the signal atmosphere at the right side of the victim F (F) drive G 41 years old, and followed by the Defendant’s front part of the Defendant’s vehicle. The Defendant continued to move back the vehicle while driving the I bus of the victim H(53 years old) driving on the two-lanes in the rear side, and received the part of the 7th part after the Defendant’s right side of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim F, caused the victim F inculatory salt and tension in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and at the same time, destroyed the victim F’s vehicle with a view to the repair cost equivalent to KRW 480,073, such as exchange of the following panion, and left the scene without taking measures, such as immediately stopping the vehicle, even though the victim H’s vehicle was damaged for approximately KRW 1,176,780, the repair cost, such as exchange of the panion, etc., and then leaving the scene.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement of drinking), on the date and time set forth in paragraph (1), driven a motor vehicle by drinking, such as drinking, snicking, snicking, snicking, snicking, snicking, snicking, snicking, snicking, etc., from the police officer K affiliated with the Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station, who called out after receiving a report of about 112 to escape about

reasonable grounds for suspect.

arrow