logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.12.04 2017고정470
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 High 470"

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act is a person engaging in driving a BK3 vehicle.

On July 18:30 on July 7, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle and proceeded ahead of the post office of a new flag, which is in front of the new flag at the time of summer, with a speed of about 40km from the tri-distance to the direction of the new flag box at the speed of the vision.

At the time, vehicles waiting for signal are stopping, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the steering employee by accurately manipulating the steering left and left well and the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so, caused the victim C to drive the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle driving by the Defendant, and followed by the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the Defendant, and the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front, and caused the victim D's vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the said victims C, such as the victim E and the victim F, who were on board the vehicle for approximately two weeks of treatment, on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the victim F such as the victim E and the victim F, who was on a low-speed car for about two weeks of treatment. At the same time, the Defendant damaged the victim D by causing approximately KRW 1,130,110 of repair cost, such as the exchange of a high-speed driver, etc., and at the same time, damaged the victim D with approximately two weeks of repair cost, and at the same time damaged the victim D with approximately KRW 1,014,520 of repair cost, such as the exchange of a panion vehicle, etc.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act is a holder of BK3 passenger cars.

The defendant does not subscribe to mandatory insurance at the same time and place as the above 1.

arrow