A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on March 31, 2018, and on March 31, 2018, at “Finging practice place” located on Seongbuk-gu Seoul and the first underground floor, “Fing practice place is singing and being detained by a female business owner.”

“The report telephone shall be made 112 with the content of “,” and the security guards belonging to the G police box of the Class A cancer Police Station sent after receiving the report shall keep the proposal for the singing practice, and the Defendant shall also control the Defendant at any later time if he finds any illegality in the singing practice room.

“At the time of solicitation to leave a singing practice hall, I wish to give the above H at the front corridor of the singing practice hall, and “I see before the singing practice hall”;

There was money received and received.

The Defendant’s cell phone phone, which had been sprinked by the disturbance, called “h, hatd at one time.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. On June 7, 2018, at around 03:30 on June 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was refused to demand the victim’s wife L to give a letter to the victim’s wife at the “K Singing practice hall” operated by the victim’s J in Jung-gu Seoul, Seoul; and (b) the victim’s wife L.

Before about thirty (30) minutes of disturbance, such as spiting spits or spits on the floor, which interfered with the operation of the victim’s singing practice hall by force for about thirty (30) minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to H, M, or N;

1. Application of the J and L’s respective Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Articles 136 (1) and 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that a police officer who assaultss a police officer with reason for sentencing and interferes with his/her duties is not weak.

However, the fact that the defendant is both recognized and reflected in the crime, and the defendant suffers from depression, and the record of the same punishment.