logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.08.07 2015고단798
컴퓨터등사용사기등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.

Seized evidence Nos. 5 and 6 shall be confiscated by Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, B, C, D, and E are the total responsibility of the organization of telecommunications-based financial fraud (in China, by inducing victims to a fake site by misrepresenting a financial institution, investigative agency, etc. in China, by entering information, such as their accounts, security card numbers, etc., and by transferring money that he/she has become aware of to another account that he/she has received in advance, and immediately withdrawn and defrauded the money, and the Defendant A is the total responsibility for the withdrawal and management of the organized personnel in Korea under the direction of L.

Defendant

A received a request for the operation of the withdrawal organization in Korea from L, and around January 10, 2015, around January 10, 2015, the Defendant D, which was known in China, was introduced into the organization of the withdrawal system. From February 1, 2015, Defendant C, around February 25, 2015, Defendant E, and Defendant B, around February 26, 2015, were introduced into the order organization with each withdrawal scheme.

이들은 L이 ‘위챗(중국의 인스턴트 메신저 어플리케이션)’을 통해 지시하면 제3자 명의 체크카드를 양수하고, 그 체크카드에 입금된 피해금을 인출한 뒤, 그 중 수수료 6%를 위 피고인들이 가지고, 나머지 94%를 L이 지정하는 계좌로 무통장 입금해주기로 상호 공모하였다. 가.

No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall take over any electronic financial medium from others.

Nevertheless, the above Defendants, in collusion with L on February 2015, take over W’s physical card from W’s bank account (X) through Kwikset service article and receive the password from L as ordered by L in collusion with L on February 2, 2015, and are in line with L’s instructions, and are indicated in the attached list of crimes: Provided, That “The details of the damage” in the list of crimes (1) in indictment (2) appears to be the simple error of “the details of the damage [the list of crimes (1)],” and it is obvious that the victim’s name in the column of damage was 16 to one number.

For example, the victim Z(for example, No. 16) is the victim Z No. 17.

arrow