1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

480 million won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

. K. D.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act by Defendant A;

A. On January 2010, the Defendant: (a) invested L in accordance with the investment policy of the REPBLICOF THE MASHALDS government; and (b) obtained a passport issued in the name of “M” by the said government; (c) however, the Defendant asked L to leave the Republic of Korea for the lack of domestic entry records to make it difficult to depart from the Republic of Korea.

Accordingly, the defendant asked L to deal with the work by requesting the public officials in charge. When the public officials raise money, the defendant said L to “the remittance of money to the head of the Tong because the money is necessary.”

On April 5, 2010, the Defendant received 30 million won from L to the company bank account (P) account under the name of the Defendant from L from L to April 5, 2010, and tried to depart from L by introducing a public official in charge, such as: (a) the Defendant transferred 30 million won in total over 10 times from April 5, 2010 to July 20, 2010, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table; and (b) the Defendant introduced a public official in charge.

As a result, the defendant received money and valuables on the pretext of solicitation for affairs handled by public officials related to immigration.

B. On November 2010, the Defendant: (a) commenced a tax investigation on Q Co., Ltd., a corporation actually operated by L on the ground of false tax invoices, etc. at the competent tax office; (b) received L’s request from L to the public official in charge; and (c) asked L to the public official in charge to complete the tax investigation.

On November 17, 2010, the Defendant received KRW 100 million from the corporate bank account in the name of R Co., Ltd. (S) in the name of L Co., Ltd., the Defendant, as representative director, to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of T Co., Ltd. (U) operated by L Co., Ltd., and received KRW 50 million in total from V, who received L’s instructions from T Co., Ltd., the Defendant received KRW 50 million in total, and attempted to introduce N, a representative director in the name of Q Co., Ltd., to complete the tax investigation.