logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.11.06 2013노2000
사기등
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court below against the defendant A is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

(b).

Reasons

1. The main points of the grounds for appeal are as follows: each sentence of the court below (the imprisonment of 10 months, the imprisonment of 10 months, the defendant C, and D: 6 months) against the defendants is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendants’ act should be punished strictly in terms of impairing the soundness of the subsidy project and causing the financial soundness of the State, which eventually leads to the damage to the citizens.

However, the defendants C and D have made a deposit of the total amount of the money obtained by deceit (the total amount of KRW 15,724,810, the amount of KRW 17,835,850) for the victim South-Nam group in the court below where the defendants were found to have made a mistake, and the court below agreed to the victim South-Nam group in the court below, and the defendant C and D have made a deposit of the total amount of the money obtained by deceit (the total amount of KRW 15,724,810, KRW 17,835,850, KRW 100, KRW 101,000, KRW 1060, KRW 800). The defendant A also deposited a considerable amount of the money obtained by the defendants in the case of the crime of this case (the amount received by the defendants in this case). It appears that the defendants were used for environment-friendly agriculture, without the same criminal record, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case such as the defendants' age, age, character and environment.

3. As such, the part of the judgment below against the Defendants is reversed pursuant to Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the appeal by the Defendants is again decided as follows.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged against the Defendants and the summary of the evidence recognized by this court is the same as the relevant column of the judgment below, and thus, they are cited in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act (Fraud and the choice of imprisonment) and each former Environment-Friendly Agriculture Promotion Act (Act No. 11459, Jun. 1, 2012) are the fostering and fostering of environment-friendly agriculture and fisheries.

arrow