1. The defendant's 23,798,848 won, the plaintiff Eul and C respectively, and 5,000,000 won, and each of the above costs.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) E is the Fropolym kikids of Fland on November 1, 2013 (hereinafter “Woo”) around 04:47.

2) The building of credit assessment information in Seo-gu, Gwangju (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”) is used to drive the relevant building.

2) The Plaintiff got off the four-lanes from the intersection of salt-based general sports center to the 1-lane 1: (a) and entered the road to the monthly luminous intersection bypassing the sidewalk; and (b) under the body of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff led the Plaintiff to approximately 140 meters in front of the monthly luminous intersection, leading the Plaintiff to approximately 140 meters in front of the monthly luminous intersection in a pipe, and caused the Plaintiff to suffer injury, such as the total fluoral flasium, etc., on the left side (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive insurance contract with respect to a sea-going vehicle.

3) Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff D are the students of Plaintiff A. [The facts that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, evidence No. 6-1, 2, and Eul’s evidence Nos. 9-1, 9-1, and video.

B. According to the above recognition of the defendant's liability for damages, the defendant is obligated to compensate the plaintiffs for damages caused by the accident of this case.

2. Limitation on liability;

A. The point of the collision and the Plaintiff’s attitude 1 at the time of the accident at the point of the accident in this case, the Plaintiffs asserted that the Plaintiff had shocked the Plaintiff, while, while the Plaintiff claimed that the hingular vehicle was hinging down the hingle of hinginginginging the hingle of hinginginging the hingle of hinginginginging the hingle of hinginginging the hingle of the hinge of the hingle of the hingle of the hingle of the hingle of the hingle of the accident in this case and the hingle of the hingle of the hingle of the hingle of the hingle of the hingle of the accident in this case, the Defendant asserted that the hingle of the hingle of the hingle of the hingle of the hingle of the hinge of the h