1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the party is that the Plaintiff is a person who drives E-E-Wurd Motor Vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff-Wed Motor Vehicle”); Defendant B is a person who drives a Fluent Motor Vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant-Wed Motor Vehicle”); Defendant C is an employee of an insurance company that entered into an automobile insurance contract for Defendant-Wed Motor Vehicle; Defendant D is an on-site investigation officer of the Road Traffic Authority.

B. On November 9, 2014, around 20:00 of the traffic accident, there was an accident that conflict between the backer right part of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was directly directed towards the monarched adjacent to the monarch of the Plaintiff’s front offender, and the lower part of the Defendant’s vehicle’s backer right part, which was directed towards the monarched adjacent to the monarched adjacent to the mons of the mons of the mons, located in the direction of the mons of the mons of the mons (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. At the time of the criminal case processing process 1), the Plaintiff asserted that the accident occurred in the instant case while Defendant B entered the said private-distance intersection in order to make a right-hand at the three-lane to H Hospital, while the Defendant entered the said private-distance intersection, the Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff met the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle while making a right-hand turn. The agent in charge of the dispatching Police Station who investigated the instant accident did not narrow the difference between the point of collision and the situation of collision, and the Road Traffic Authority requested the accident analysis as an on-site investigation officer, and Defendant D conducted the accident analysis of this case, such as the situation of the accident and the point of collision. 2) As a result, Defendant D analyzed the collision in accordance with the form of the vehicle damage, the vehicle operation and the vehicle operation at the Defendant’s motor vehicle parking site, and the collision with the point of the accident that the Defendant asserted in the face of collision, the result of the analysis of the conflict between the point of the accident and the point of the present situation.