logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.04.10 2013고단7925
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The accused is a person who is engaged in driving service of TG cars by violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. of Specific Crimes, violation of the Road Traffic Act, and violation of the Road Traffic Act;

On November 11, 2013, at around 04:15, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, changed the lane into four-lanes while driving from the remote distance room of the Southern East Police Station to the remote distance room of the South East East Police Station, according to five-lanes of the 1177 North East-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City while under the influence of blood alcohol content of 0.238% without a driver’s license.

At the same time, the four-lanes of the victim F driver's G car was in progress, so in such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the driving business, has a duty of care to check the front left, check the safety of the course, check the safety of the course and change the lane.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to pay alcohol and changed the lane to the left side of the TG car and received the side part of the said Schlage car from the left side of the TG car.

The Defendant, while driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol that is difficult to drive normally due to the influence of alcohol, suffered from the injury of the victim H, the victim I, and the Council of the victims, such as dynasium in the bones of wood, which require two weeks of medical treatment.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any automobile on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the TG car in accordance with Paragraph 1, because he did not subscribe to mandatory insurance at the same place, such as Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A H statement;

1. A survey report on actual condition and photographs of each accident site;

1. Notification of the results of the regulation of drinking driving, the report on the state of drinking drivers, and the suspect; and

arrow