1. The Seoul Central District Court 2009 tea54347 takes over money between the social company and Defendant B.

According to the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1 through 5 of this case and the whole arguments, a social company organized by the Eastyang (hereinafter “foreign company”) has each claim against Defendant B based on the payment order of the transfer money case and the Seoul Central District Court 2009Da231457 decided on Oct. 20, 2010, the Plaintiff acquired each claim against the Defendants from the non-party company around October 20, 2010, and the Plaintiff was delegated with the authority to notify the assignment of claim from the non-party company and did not deliver each notice of the transfer of claim to the Defendants. Since it constitutes a case where it is impossible to prove that the Plaintiff succeeded to the creditor indicated by the judgment, it is so decided as per Disposition by granting the transfer execution clause to the Plaintiff pursuant to Articles 33 and 31 of the Civil Execution Act.