logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.17 2018가단3258
집행문부여의 소
Text

1. The Seoul Central District Court case 2009 Ghana1237773 takes over money between the social company and the defendant, which took place.

Reasons

1. The facts stated in the annexed sheet may be acknowledged as either in dispute between the parties or in combination with the whole purport of the pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence 1 through 5;

Although the defendant asserts that there was no delivery of judgment or assignment of claims, the Seoul Central District Court 2009da1237773 transfer money case between the social company and the defendant, which became final and conclusive around September 2, 2009, was sentenced to a favorable judgment on September 2, 2009. The fact that no subsequent appeal was filed is significant in this court.

In addition, according to the evidence mentioned above, it is acknowledged that a social company (the change of mission of Meson C&C to a loan company) established by Dongyang-gu has transferred claims by the above judgment to the plaintiff (the transfer of title prior to the change) and sent the content certification to the defendant. In addition, in this case, the above written notice of assignment of claims in this case was submitted with a documentary evidence (Evidence A No. 3) and delivered to the defendant on January 26, 2018, and the fact that the above documentary evidence was delivered to the defendant on January 26, 2018 is obvious in the record, and at the latest, the fact that the assignment of claims was notified to

2. According to the above facts of recognition, since the claims against the defendant of the social company 2009 Ghana 1237773 by the Seoul Central District Court against the defendant were transferred to the plaintiff, the junior administrative officer of the Seoul Central District Court, etc. shall grant the execution clause to the plaintiff, who is the successor of the social company dongyang that occurred for compulsory execution against the defendant.

3. The plaintiff's claim is justified and accepted.

arrow