1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 8,183,150 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 3,987,00 to Plaintiff B; (c) KRW 10,419,750 to Plaintiff C; and (d) KRW 16,17 to Plaintiff D.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business name 1) Business name: Business area for the project implementer for the Kim Sea Ballast General Industrial Complex Development Project: Defendant A: Public notice of approval for the project implementation of the project for the implementation of the project for the implementation of the 1,522,00 square meters of the Janhae-si Ga, the Dogriwon 1,52,000 square meters: August 1, 2012; No. 2012-131; June 27, 2013; public notice of the change (public notice of approval) of Kimhae-si on June 27, 2013

B. On October 29, 2013, the date of commencement of expropriation by the Gyeongnam-do Regional Land Expropriation Committee (hereinafter “Adjudication of Expropriation”): On December 28, 2013, the date of commencement of expropriation: On December 2, 2013: The land subject to expropriation is indicated in the column of “land subject to expropriation” as indicated in the attached Table.

(3) Compensation money: (4) As indicated in the column for “adjudication amount” in attached Table 3: A new appraisal corporation in the future of the corporation, and a fixed appraisal corporation and a fixed appraisal corporation. (4) An appraiser: A new appraisal corporation in the future of the corporation.

C. Compensation (Adjudgment 1 of June 19, 2014) by the Central Land Expropriation Committee: As indicated in the column for “amount of objection” in the attached Table 2: An appraiser: Sam Chang Chang Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Seoul Chang”) and the Central Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Central”; hereinafter referred to as “Adjudication Appraiser”)

D. By July 24, 2014, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiffs the amount of the ruling on objection as compensation for the land subject to expropriation.

E. The result of the commission of appraisal to the Gyeongnam Certified Public Appraiser Office of this Court (hereinafter “court appraisal”) is as indicated in the column for the amount of appraisal by the court in the annexed sheet.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute; Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2; Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 12 (including numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply); the court's commission of appraisal to the office of Gyeongnam Certified Public Appraiser; the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The 1st adjudication appraiser on the plaintiffs' assertion should select K as a comparative standard in evaluating J, which is the land subject to the confinement of the plaintiff H.