The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

At around 18:20 on October 3, 2012, the Defendant, a family member C and D, was driving a D driving vehicle and continued on the road front of the “F” coffee specialty store located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, the Defendant got obstructed in communication due to the vehicle G (n.e., the age of 41) of the victim G (n.e., who was stopped at that place, caused the victim and the Si expenses to be lowered from the vehicle in the C and D, and led the victim to a satitis that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Part concerning G's interrogation protocol concerning prosecutor's office, protocol of interrogation concerning prosecutor's office as to D's protocol

1. Among each police interrogation protocol of the defendant and the police interrogation protocol of the defendant and D, the part concerning G and the police interrogation protocol of the police interrogation protocol of G

1. G statements;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the same Act (Article 59(1) of the same Act provides that the Defendant’s mistake is divided in depth and will not be committed in the future; the motive and circumstances of