Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On July 7, 2018, the Defendant cut off all the power distribution lines within the power distribution line owned by the victim E, a lessor, and the owner of a building installed there on the ground that the Defendant, at the construction site of “C”, a coffee specialty store located in B 1st, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and the lessee, called “C, does not lick up on the table table.”

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the power distribution line, which is owned by the victim F, and at the same time interfered with the preparation of the victim D's carpeting business by force.

The part of the facts charged was revised to the extent that it does not materially disadvantage the defendant's defense right.

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination of the suspect's interrogation of the defendant's partial statement in the court (the interrogation - D's statement);

1. The police investigation report (including the video image analysis - the video image conversation), investigation report (including the video image conversation content) H's confirmation of the fact, written confirmation, field photographs, video CDs, text messages, tax invoices, and written statement of the statement of the statement of the statement of the police with D (According to the above evidence, the power distribution line that the Defendant cut up at the time of the instant case is consistent with the coffee chain building, and it is recognized that it was owned by the victim F, the owner of the building, because it was consistent with the coffee chain building. It is reasonable to view that the Defendant damaged the property by cutting the Gap self power distribution line against the victim D's will at his request, and at the same time interfered with the preparation of coffee chain business by impairing the power distribution facilities necessary for coffee chain business at the same time. The Defendant and the defense counsel should not be accepted, and thus, the Defendant and the defense counsel shall not be admitted to the allegation that the crime was committed in light of the circumstances before and after the instant case, the location of cut lines, the method and method of crime, etc.