logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.01.08 2019누59525
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following additional parts, thereby citing it pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In light of the background of the establishment of the refugee system, the movement of the international community extending the grounds for recognition of refugee status, the necessity of the development of “a member of a specific social group,” the subject of gambling is not limited to State agencies, and the state situation of India, etc. between “A” and “the Plaintiff” under the 3rd part of the judgment of the first instance, the Plaintiff asserts that the threat of the Plaintiff was a threat may be deemed to be a boom on the ground of his status as a member of a religion or a specific social group among the grounds for recognition of refugee status. However, the Plaintiff added “.”

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow