logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.01.22 2019누60815
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following additional parts, thereby citing it pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In front of the third 10th 10th 10th 10 decision of the first instance, “Plaintiffs” added “In light of the background of the establishment of the refugee system, movement of international society extending the grounds for recognition of refugee status, the need for a balanced interpretation of “specific social group members,” and the state situation of Senegal in the world, etc., the Plaintiff’s continued threat from another decentralization may be deemed as persecution for reasons for recognition of refugee status, on the ground that it is a member of a religion or a specific social group, among the reasons for recognition of refugee status.”

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow