The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning for appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment (four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant is led to confession and reflect, the fact that the present location of the business in this case is closed and the removal of the facilities stated that he would not again act as an intermediary for commercial sex acts, the defendant was punished by a fine for the same kind of crime, the defendant was committed again at the same place without being aware of the fact that he was under the suspension of execution period due to the same kind of crime, and the defendant's operation period of the business in this case is not short, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable, taking into account all the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, sex behavior, motive for the crime, frequency of crime, method of crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.