The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court are too unreasonable.

2. In light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant is led to confession and reflect by the judgment; (b) the period of operation is not long; (c) the closure of the instant establishment and the statement that he would not arrange sexual traffic again; and (d) the fact that equity should be taken into account at the same time with the case subject to punishment for the crime of violating the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as the Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, etc., which became final and conclusive; (b) the fact that there was a past record of being punished for fines for the same crime; (c) the fact that the instant establishment is operated in another place while being tried for the same crime; and (d) the fact that the scale of the instant establishment operated by the Defendant appears to be small; and (e) the Defendant’s age, sex, motive, frequency of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.