Defendant

A A Fines of 15 million won, Defendant B and D of each fine of 4 million won, and Defendant C of each fine of 2 million won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A operated a business of “G” with 15 rooms, etc. on the first floor and underground floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and employed Thailand FH, etc. as female employees.

Defendant

B, Defendant C, and Defendant D were the employees of the above business establishment in charge of the entertainment of customers.

The Defendants conspired with each other from October 15, 2013 to July 24, 2014, and engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic, such as arranging sexual traffic, by inducing the female employees of H, etc. and sexual intercourse, after receiving KRW 1.30,00 from male customers in the name of the Defendants to receive KRW 1.30,00 from the male customers in the name of the Defendants.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports, photographs, investigation reports, business districts, etc., investigation reports (Attachment of copies of business books), business districts, etc., investigation reports (Attachment of copies of business books), business districts, etc., investigation reports (Attachment of copies of credit card sales slips) and copies of sales slips;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Confiscation Defendant A, B, and C: The sentencing reasons under Article 25(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. are the size of the crime in this case, the period and method of the crime, the method of the crime, the profits from the crime, the defendants' wrong recognition and reflects. Defendant A is only a person who has been sentenced to a fine on several occasions due to the violation of the Military Service Act. Defendant C, C, C, and D are primary offenders. Defendant C, C, C, and D are employees, and Defendant C's working period seems not to be long, and other circumstances such as the defendants' age, character and behavior, family environment, motive and consequence of the crime, the means and result of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.