logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.11.02 2016고단1153
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million and by a fine of KRW 2 million.

The Defendants did not pay a fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, from September 11, 2015 to November 4, 2015, employed and waiting for a place of business by hiring female sexual traffic in the name-free business place operated by Defendant C from around the net time point of time from around September 11, 2015 to around November 4, 2015. Defendant A, who found his/her place of business, had 150,000 won or more as the price for sexual traffic from males who found their place of business, have them enter the place of business with sexual traffic as well as female sexual traffics and females who had sexual traffics, and had 80,000 won out of the price for sexual traffics received from customers, paid to

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts.

2. Defendant B received benefits of KRW 1,500,000 per month at the date, time, and place referred to in the above paragraph (a), and as the chief of the management department, Defendant B aided and abetted the above A’s arrangement of commercial sex acts by facilitating the commission of commercial sex acts by managing sexual traffic women in order to assist them in doing the above arrangement of commercial sex acts by allowing them to settle sexual traffic prices with males, and providing them with guidance to a room.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant’s legal statement

E/F The application of the police statement G, F, and E’s statement seizure records and investigation report on the enforcement site photographs of the list of seizure (a copy of credit card sales slips)

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc.; Defendant A who selects a fine: Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic; Article 32 of the Criminal Act; Article 32 of the Criminal Act;

2. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.

3. Defendant B: Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic.

4. Although social harm caused by sexual traffic business establishments with the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order needs to be severe punishment, the defendants reflects the mistakes, the defendants A are the primary offenders, and the defendants B are also the defendants.

arrow