1. The Defendant indicated in the attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 1 among the land size of 883 square meters in Gangseo-si B, Gangseo-si.

1. In full view of the fact that there is no dispute between the parties to the judgment on the cause of the claim, the entry of Gap evidence No. 1 (including the virtual number), and the result of this court’s commission of the appraiser Korea Land Information Corporation to conduct a survey and appraisal on the appraiser Korea Land Information Corporation, the fact that part of the "B" part of the building owned by the defendant on the ground of each of the annexed map No. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 12 of the annexed map No. 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 13 of the annexed map No. 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 1000 square meters owned by the plaintiff (hereinafter “instant part of the building”).

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to remove the part of the building of this case and deliver the relevant land to the plaintiff as the exclusion of interference based on the plaintiff's land ownership.

2. As to the judgment on the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant alleged that the Defendant was in possession of the instant land leased from C, the former owner of the instant land, and thus, comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in the written evidence Nos. 2 and 3, the Defendant concluded a lease contract with the Defendant on March 30, 2015, setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00.

I would like to say.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

In addition, the defendant has legal superficies on the land of this case.