The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. At around 11:00 on May 28, 2014, Defendant B: (a) performed an act for the victim A (the age of 63) who is a security guard prior to a week in Gangdong-gu Seoul E apartment reconstruction site guard; (b) had the victim A (the age of 63) performed an act for his subordinate staff who is easy to extend the time of occupation; and (c) assaulted the victim A’s bat bat at the same time and place as above; and (d) Defendant A used the victim B’s fat fat, at the same time and place as above, and used the safety fat bat 2-3 times for the victim B’s head.

2. The above facts charged constitute Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. On the fifth day of January 27, 2015, the date of the indictment of this case, the victim A withdrawn his/her wish to punish Defendant B, and the victim B withdraws his/her wish to punish Defendant A, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.