1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 22,804,883 as well as to the plaintiff on May 2015.

1. The reasons for this part of the facts are as follows: (a) the entry of the first instance court’s “basic facts” in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act is the same as that of the second instance court’s judgment, except where the “definite population” in Article 2(1) of the first instance court’s judgment is deemed as “profinite population.”

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The grounds for the statement in this part by the court of first instance are as follows, except where the defendant's "the defendant" in Section 21 of the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance is "the plaintiff".

A. Since the content of the assertion is the same as that of the partial entry, it shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. As to the claim in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 1, the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant should compensate for damages of KRW 19,800,000, since ruptures occurred on the floor of the parking lot due to the Defendant’s instant construction work, and carried out a waterproof construction work with KRW 19,80,00. The Defendant’s ruptures, Gap’s 14,15 video images (including the land number, the appraisal results of the first instance trial appraiser D and the first instance trial appraiser H, Kim Jong-Un’s Kim Jong-Un’s 24 November 24, 2017; the first instance trial appraiser No. 2505, Nov. 25, 2018; and the first instance trial of April 26, 2018; the Defendant’s ruptures of the instant construction site using T-4,000 air to the instant construction; the Plaintiff’s entire appraisal and vibration was likely to have been generated due to the expansion of the construction site and its existing construction site.