logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.03.02 2015고단7868
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of seven million won per person.

If the Defendants did not pay their respective fines, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a business owner that operates a marina business in the trade name of "F" with one shower room, four hot-weaker room and four marina rooms, with a size of 40 square meters on the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E and three floors, and Defendant B is a head of the office that manages marina business.

No person shall arrange, etc. sexual intercourse, etc. with an unspecified person for business purposes, in return for promising to receive or promise to receive money, valuables or other property benefits.

Nevertheless, from January 13, 2015 to April 10, 2015, Defendants conspired to find the place of the said marina business from the above marina business, and provided a room room with 8 to 130,000 won in return for male customers, and had sexual intercourse with female customers, etc. enter the room, thereby having sexual intercourse with female customers and to attract their sexual organ and scambling them under the above conditions, thereby having them do sexual intercourse with the business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officer in G;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. and the Selection of a fine concerning facts constituting an offense

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of the workhouse (defendants)

1. Confiscation (Defendant B) Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The sentencing criteria shall not be applied as a fine is selected for the crime in the judgment.

2. Although the Defendants conspired to engage in commercial sex acts and arrange commercial sex acts for such business, the Defendants made their own efforts to prevent recidivism, such as the motive and scale of the crime in this case, the Defendants’ acknowledgement of and reflects on the crime, and the closure of business, and the Defendants’ intention to take into account the absence of the same kind of force.

arrow