logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.02.23 2016가단115101
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 2,096,200 as well as 5% per annum from August 31, 2014 to February 23, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 31, 2014, at around 14:00, the Defendant was faced with the Plaintiff’s right fluoral fluoral fluoral part of the baby’s fluoral part, which was pushing ahead with the baby in the middle-gu D market of Daegu, Daegu, Daegu, with the wheels of the baby’s fluoral fluoral part, and caused the Plaintiff to suffer the Plaintiff to the right fluoral fluor and the bid for two weeks of treatment.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The Defendant was indicted for causing bodily injury by negligence in the instant accident, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 70,000.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 4-1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence and scope of liability for damages;

A. According to the above fact of recognition of the liability for damages, the accident of this case occurred by negligence of the defendant who did not pay due attention to prevent the mother from facing people.

As such, the defendant is liable for damages sustained by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case.

B. (1) The Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant is obligated to compensate for the above medical expenses, since the Plaintiff spent KRW 6,606,532 in total due to hospitalization and treatment costs due to the instant accident.

In addition to the overall purport of the pleadings in the statement No. 11-1 and No. 2 of the evidence No. 11-2, the sum of KRW 41,100, and KRW 55,100, and KRW 96,200, paid by the Plaintiff after the instant accident, shall be included in the medical expenses incurred by the instant accident.

After all, according to the records of evidence Nos. 4-2 through 7, 3, 11-2, 3, 11-3 through 29, 12, and 13 concerning whether the remaining medical expenses incurred by the Plaintiff constituted the medical expenses in relation to the instant accident, the Plaintiff’s diagnosis of other salivities, salivities, and salivities and salivities at the Ginwon on Oct. 11, 2014 after the instant accident was conducted by the Ginwon on Jun. 8, 2015; the diagnosis of salivosiss, salt and salunits at the Hin Hospital on Jun. 8, 2015; and the diagnosis of saliviums, salunits, etc. at the Kin Hospital on July 27, 2015.

arrow