Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On July 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a E-Poter sprink sprinking 0.148% alcohol concentration in blood without obtaining a driver’s license from around 500 meters in the direction of “D” in front of the front of the “special construction” to the front of the “D food,” which is located in the direction of the 32-2:25 crossing-gun, a light of the Road Traffic Act (a non-licenseed driving) on July 9, 2016.
2. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of freight cars as stated in the above paragraph (1) of this Article, who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Egressing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.
On July 9, 2016, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle at around 22:25, and proceeded with the “D” food vehicle at the crossing-gun C, with the one-lane road from the “Saeaeaeaeaeaeaeaeaea which would be well-being” page.
At the time, it was a road where the center line of the yellow-ray was installed at night and at that time, so in such a case, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving of the motor vehicle to live well before and safely drive the motor vehicle.
Nevertheless, as stated in Paragraph 1 of the above, Defendant 1, without a driver’s license, was negligent in driving the center line in a breath while under the influence of alcohol without a driver’s license, and the part of the victim f (33 Do) driving GK5 car driven in the opposite direction to the Defendant’s running direction was shocked by the back door of the said cargo vehicle driven by the Defendant.
As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence on the part of the victim for about three weeks of tensions, tensions, etc., and at the same time, did not stop immediately to rescue the damaged person, and failed to take necessary measures, such as saving the damaged person, even if the said car was damaged by the gate painting, etc. to be repaired in KRW 1,225,858.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1.The police of F. F.