logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.09.06 2017고단6341
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 24, 2017, 02:30, the Defendant: “C” at the main point of the “C” located in Heungdong-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu; “Arh-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir-si, Ir

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statements made by witnesses D in the second public trial records;

1. The written statement made by the police against D [1] The victim D is subject to the police investigation by raising an issue immediately after the instant case, and the defendant's indecent act was made in a specific and consistent manner from that time to that time, and credibility is found.

(2) On the day of the instant case, the Defendant was seated in the lower table.

E also observed that the defendant was able to sit and sit as the victim was spokingd after the victim.

Clearly stated.

E In light of the E’s attitude of statement in this Court, there is credibility of the statement, and there is no reason to intervene in the statement by falsity.

In addition, considering the structure of the restaurant in this case and the height of the seat, E is considered not to have difficulty in witnessing the defendant's act.

③ The F stated that the Defendant was able to sit with the victim’s shoulder by hand, and that there was no fact that the Defendant she was her fingers between the victim’s her fingers as stated in the facts constituting a crime.

However, F is that investigative agencies have taken the shoulder of the victim by two descendants.

The statement was made (33 pages of investigation records), and since the entrance from the main point to the table was continuously made by the defendant, the defendant's hand was divided by the remaining hand.

The defendant India made a contradictory statement (the defendant India investigative agency).

arrow