logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.04.07 2016고단345
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol to ask questions about the circumstances of the instant case from the Busan East Police Station C District Assistant D, the Busan East Police Station, where the Defendant was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 domestic violence at the Defendant’s residence located in the Busan East-gu B and the third floor; and (b) was under the influence of alcohol; (c) whether the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol to death on the face of the Defendant; and (d) whether the Defendant entered the

The police officer, such as putting off his clothes or her photographed, referring to “a complaint filed by affixing a photo,” and putting a bath at several times, has threatened the police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the control and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. 112 Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on reported details;

1. In light of the following facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the relevant criminal facts; Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the Criminal Procedure for the sentencing of the sentence of imprisonment [the scope of the recommended sentence]; Article 136(1) of the basic area (from June to January 4) of the Act (the interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) [the decision of sentence] No person subject to a special sentencing] [the crime subject to a special sentencing] is committed before a certain degree of public authority and has a significant social prejudice; the crime of this case is a continuous threat to the police officer dispatched after receiving the 112 report; the nature of the crime is not good; the defendant appears not to violate his wrong act committed by the investigative agency after the defendant was arrested; the defendant appears to have been subject to a suspended sentence due to interference with the performance of official duties in 196.

arrow