beta
Text
1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.
Purport of claim and appeal
1.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as follows, except for adding the following judgments to the pertinent part as to the contents asserted by the Defendants in the court of first instance, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure
2. Additional matters to be determined;
A. On June 10, 2015, H, the representative director of the Plaintiff’s assertion by the Defendants, had a consultation on the grant of PF funds with the relevant P, Defendant D, and Defendant C (hereinafter “C”)’s representative director, and employees of B and NonS investment securities at the office of NonS Investment Securities Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “NonS Investment Securities”) (hereinafter “NonS Investment Securities”).
Therefore, the Plaintiff’s joint business contract concluded by G and E as a H’s agent on March 3, 2015 and the J concluded as the Plaintiff’s representative director should be deemed as ratified on March 19, 2015.
B. 1) Determination 1) The ratification of unauthorized representation or invalidation is a single act with knowledge of the act of unauthorized representation and the effect of the act is not required to vest in the person in question, and it does not require a certain method with respect to the method of expressing his/her intent explicitly or implicitly. However, in order to acknowledge implied ratification, there are circumstances to deem that the person in question sufficiently understand the legal status faced by the act in question and that the result of the act in question belongs to himself/herself on the basis of the person in question (see Supreme Court Decision 2009Da37831, Sept. 24, 2009). This legal principle is likewise applicable to the ratification of unauthorized Representation (see Supreme Court Decision 2009Da71312, Nov. 13, 2014); according to each description of evidence No. 25, 26, and 27, the representative director of the Plaintiff’s respective representative director, Defendant C’s joint investment securities at the first instance court of June 10, 2015.