Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff entered into an agency contract with F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) with the trade name “E” and sold cement supplied from F to Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) from May 2013 to August 2013 as listed below.
On May 31, 2013, the issue date of tax invoices: (a) 5,694.24 5,563,920,823 June 30, 2013; (b) 47,071.59,07.024,651,973,047; (c) 3,701,976; (d) 33,974; (e) 33,974; (e) 2,670,670, 323, total sum of 210,746, 168, 194, 194,377,377
B. For the payment of cement proceeds to the Plaintiff, the Defendant Company issued each promissory note as indicated below (hereinafter “instant sheet”) with the Plaintiff as the addressee.
순번 발행일 어음번호 만기일 액면(원) 1 2013. 6. 27. G 2013. 10. 1. 2,031,960,412 2 2013. 6. 27. H 2013. 10. 9. 2,031,960,411 3 2013. 7. 1. I 2013. 9. 30. 500,000,000 4 2013. 7. 1. J 2013. 9. 30. 1,000,000,000 5 2013. 7. 25. K 2013. 10. 28. 500,000,000 6 2013. 7. 25. L 2013. 10. 28. 1,000,000,000 7 2013. 7. 25. M 2013. 10. 29. 1,151,973,047 8 2013. 7. 25. N 2013. 10. 30. 2,000,000,000 9 2013. 8. 27. O 2013. 11. 28. 2,000,000,000 10 2013. 8. 27. P 2013. 11. 29. 500,000,000 11 2013. 8. 27. Q 2013. 11. 29. 1,201,976,574 12 2013. 9. 27. R 2013. 12. 26. 1,000,000,000 13 2013. 9. 27. S 2013. 12. 27. 500,000,000 14 2013. 9. 27. T 2013. 12. 27. 1,170,323,933 합계 16,588,194,377
C. The Plaintiff endorsed and transferred to F the remaining Promissory Notes except for the promissory Notes Nos. 3 among each of the Promissory Notes stated in the instant Schedule.
On September 24, 2013 and September 26, 2013, the Defendant Company repaid the total amount of KRW 5,031,960,412 (= KRW 2,031,960,412) of the Promissory Notes Nos. 1,6, and 8 of the instant Table to F (= KRW 2,031,960,412,000,000,000).
E. On October 17, 2013, the Seoul Central District Court rendered a decision to commence rehabilitation proceedings with respect to the Defendant Company (2013 Gohap186, hereinafter referred to as the “instant rehabilitation proceedings”), and Defendant C and D are the Defendant Company.