logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.04.26 2017고단2657
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or Dental Prize) is a person engaged in driving a vehicle in Etiball.

On September 10, 2017, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.181% in blood at around 15:10 on September 10, 201, and led to the two-way course at the direction of the entrance of the legal village in the Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-do.

However, there was a place where people walk around the village, and the road was bended by the coordinates, and the person in India was walking at the time, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the front and right and the right and the right and the right of the driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant received the victim F. (70) who is walking along (70) as the above vehicle due to negligence exceeding the delivery on the right side of the proceeding direction and had the victim go beyond the ground.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant suffered from an injury to a hot spring, etc., which does not have any wound within two weeks of open medical treatment, due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant immediately stopped and left the scene without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victimized person, even though he did not take necessary measures.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) driven the vehicles described in paragraph (1) at the section of approximately 3 km from the Cheongsado in front of the Cheongsado to the place described in paragraph (1), located outside the land of the south-gun, under the influence of alcohol content of 0.181% among the blood transfusions at the time specified in paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the Defendant driven an automobile while under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A traffic accident report, a survey report, and an accident scene photograph;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol driving;

1. Investigative Report (in the application of the Dmark above drinking);

arrow