logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.10.20 2016고단932
자동차관리법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall forge, alter, or unlawfully use a registration number plate under the Motor Vehicle Management Act, or use a forged or altered registration number plate.

The Defendant, on March 16, 2015, was kept in custody of the registration number plate of C C C C C in possession of the Defendant on the unpaid fine for negligence, and on March 2015, the written indictment in the Jeonjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D in which the Defendant’s children’s residence are his/her children, is stated as “F” but it is an obvious clerical error.

The E Apartment 1, 201, by means of a computer, entered “C”, which is a No. 1 number of a car, was forged by means of printing out in accordance with the size of the number plate and attaching a transparent Acryp board thereafter.

On March 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) attached and operated a forged motor vehicle registration number plate on the front of the half-way intersection in Seocho-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City; (b) from that time to January 12, 2016, the Defendant attached and operated the forged motor vehicle registration number plate on seven occasions, such as the attached list of crimes, from that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of the details of the C unmanned control and the control of a camera for crime prevention), the details of shooting of a camera for crime prevention, photographs of a camera for crime prevention, details of unmanned control, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the ledger of vehicles;

1. Article 78 subparagraph 2 of the Automobile Management Act and Articles 71 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense and the option of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the Defendant was punished by a fine for the same kind of crime even before the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the crime of this case committed by forging and attaching a car number plate and operating the vehicle is not deemed to be poor.

However, there is a serious conflict between the defendant and the defendant.

The defendant is all punished by a fine for negligence.

arrow