logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.11.22 2016가단532811
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) from August 26, 2015 to Plaintiff A, KRW 3,000,000, respectively, and each of them.

Reasons

1. Evidence 【Evidence】1, A2, A3, A4, A7, A8-1, 2, B-1, 2, B-3, 3-1, 4-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings;

A. Around March 2010, D insurance contracts between D and the Defendant entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant as to the insured, E-insurance premium, insurance premium 34,650 won, insurance period from March 5, 2010 to March 5, 2020 with the effect that the Defendant secured for the death of injury (the security amount of KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000 as security), the injury and high-speed disability (the security amount of KRW 10,000,000,000), the general injury and aftermath (the security amount of KRW 10,000,000,000), and the personal injury liability (the security amount of KRW 10,000,000) during the family life.

B. 1) The occurrence of an insurance accident occurred. D’s father F (G livelihood, 12 years old) boarded a bicycle on the 1-lane road in front of the children protection zone in the Imath in the Imath of Hasung C on August 26, 2015, without verifying the Plaintiff A (Js and 5 years old) who is crossing the road to the port from the right side of the right side of the right side, and without confirming the Plaintiff A (Js and 5 years old). (hereinafter “the insurance accident in this case”).

(2) The Plaintiff A was diagnosed by the left-hand pelvis-Gyeong-Gyeong-Gyeong-Gyeong-Wodon’s upper end of the instant insurance accident, and received non-cerebral typology using Fin on August 27, 2015. After the surgery on September 7, 2015, Plaintiff A received re-explosion and fin stocking as a result of the surgery, and continued to suffer from stress disorder after the surgery.

C. Plaintiff B is the father of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C is the mother of his female.

2. Existence of damage liability and scope of damage compensation

A. According to the fact of the existence of damage claim, the F is obligated to observe the speed of limitation in order to protect children from the danger of traffic accidents on a road without a crosswalk in a children protection zone, and to temporarily suspend a pedestrian crossing in order to ensure the safety of children, if there are children crossing the road.

arrow