Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On November 24, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Eastern District Court on November 24, 2006, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court on October 8, 2010, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court on January 8, 2014, and was sentenced to a suspension of execution for eight months and two years for a suspension of execution.

1. On January 2, 2015, the Defendant driven DK5 vehicles in the state of blood alcohol concentration of about 0.159 percent in a section of approximately one kilometer from around the 21:25 to the same light apartment located in Pyeongtaek-si Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong, around January 12, 2015.

2. On January 30, 2015, the Defendant driven D K5 cars at the 2km section from the front side of the Dong-type apartment in Pyeongtaek-si lock to the front side of the Dong-dong apartment located in Pyeongtaek-si lock, while under the influence of alcohol around 20:05, around January 30, 2015, under the influence of alcohol by 0.142%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the situation of running a driving under the influence of alcohol, inquiry into the results of the crackdown on driving under the influence of alcohol, and report on the actions for driving under the influence

1. Previouss before and after judgments: Application of criminal history records, investigation reports (former records, court rulings and summary orders);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of fines for the crime, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order: The serious reflectivity, and when the suspension of execution is revoked as a sentence is sentenced, the conditions unfavorable to the defendant as a result of the excessive harsh treatment: repeated crimes of the same kind (However, five years have elapsed since the last crimes); and