The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The following facts are considered: (a) the Defendant recognized all of the instant offenses; (b) the Defendant appears to have committed the instant offenses in favor of the Defendant; (c) the Defendant committed the instant offenses in favor of the Defendant, even though having been sentenced several times due to the same thief crimes; (d) the Defendant had been sentenced several times of punishment, and the Defendant committed the instant offenses only more than forty (40) days after being discharged, and the Defendant was not discharged, and most of the victims have not been recovered; (d) there is no change of circumstances that may otherwise determine the punishment after the pronouncement of the lower judgment; (e) the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, family environment, motive and background of the instant offenses; and (e) other various sentencing conditions as indicated in the argument of the Supreme Court; and (e) the application result of the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.