beta
Text
Defendant
A A shall be punished by a fine of five million won, by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.
Defendant
A does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On July 19, 2018, Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment for three years and six months at the Jeju District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Act by force in relation to relatives), and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 24, 2018.
【Criminal Facts】
Husband and wife are simple, and C is a father and wife of the Defendants.
Defendant
B On January 9, 2018, the Jeju District Court: “On August 20, 2017, the Defendants committed an indecent act by force by inserting the Defendant’s sexual flag on the part of the Defendant’s dwelling, her chest, her chest, her chest, and her finger by inserting the female’s negative finger.”
“The Defendant was indicted as charged and sentenced to the foregoing judgment. On January 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) denied the crime in the above trial process; (b) had the wife A, who was in the residence of the Defendant, made a statement consistent with the Defendant’s assertion; and (c) led the Defendant to a favorable outcome in the trial. Accordingly, around April 2018, the Defendant drafted an application stating the false statement to the effect that “A had no victim at his office in the P.M. on August 20, 2017,” and caused the female to have “A make a statement according to the written written written written written written written written written written written written written written written written in the P.M.,” and said, “A, who had been in the place of residence of the Defendant at Jeju-si D, had A make a false testimony.”
Accordingly, at the Jeju District Court No. 201 in April 19, 2018, A testified as a witness in the case of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes against the Defendant No. 2018Gohap6 of the above court, and testified as stated in Paragraph 2.
Accordingly, the Defendant instigated A to make a false statement contrary to his memory, thereby instigating A with perjury.
2. On April 2018, Defendant A’s perjury was asked by B to give a false testimony for the foregoing perjury.
the same shall apply.