Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a passenger car B.

On January 6, 2013, at around 18:50, the above vehicle was driven under the influence of alcohol of 0.138%, and the road was driven ahead of the area of the Daejeon Daejeon Agricultural Agreement, which is located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon.

A person engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care to safely drive motor vehicles by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to perform the above duty of care in a state where it is difficult for the Defendant to drive a motor vehicle normally while under the influence of alcohol and by negligence while driving the motor vehicle on the right side of the motor vehicle driven by the Defendant and received the side side of the left side of the D motor vehicle driven by the victim C (the age of 49).

As above, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt dynasium in need of medical treatment for about three weeks, by negligence in the course of performing duties, while driving a motor vehicle normally due to drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. Report on detection of a host driver and report on the circumstances of a host driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 5-11 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes concerning the crime and Article 5-11 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the point of causing bodily injury to the drive at risk) and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of driving at risk and the

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment is that the defendant's refusal to take a drinking test and response to the measurement at the latest after the crime is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, there is no criminal history before the crime of this case is committed by the defendant who is seen from the crypt of the crypt.