A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

The defendant pays 60,000,000 won to the applicant through fraud.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On August 10, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months for the crime of embezzlement at the Seoul Western District Court on August 18, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 18, 2017.

[2018 Height 30] The Defendant is the actual operator of the F.S. in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., which provides “worker dispatch services and pay job placement services.”

On December 7, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victims of the F Office "on the basis that it is necessary to operate the F Office in fact, and that the F Office borrowed KRW 60 million from F to F to the Fund that it is necessary to acquire the Fund in charge of the dispute settlement agreement, he/she acquired and operated G with the proceeds, and paid the principal and interest with the proceeds.

However, the fact is that the FF is in arrears with office management expenses and taxes, and the employee's benefits are not paid from time to time, and there was no intention or ability to repay them even if it borrows money from the victims.

The Defendant received KRW 22,00,000 from the victim H on December 7, 2016, from the victim H, and KRW 8,000,000 on December 7, 2016, and KRW 30,000,000 on December 16, 2016, from the victim I, from the victim I, to the business bank account in the name of the FB Bank account operated by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims to receive property.

[2018 Highest 4188] The Defendant is a person who substantially operates the Bank of Korea, which is a cleaning business entity in the Seoul Metropolitan Government D D Building E.

On May 2016, the Defendant knew that the victim B, who had contacted for about 10 years from the early 10 years ago, was faced with the employment problem of the children, and had them employed as a staff member of the LAF, and had them borrow money from the damaged party for the purpose of the company operation fund.

On May 3, 2016, the Defendant stated on telephone that “The Defendant shall pay KRW 5 million to the victim with the company’s funds, and he/she shall pay it after the lapse of every week.”

In fact, however, the LAF is very poor in operation and there is no balance in the account.