1. Preliminary Defendants jointly share KRW 25,000,000 to the Plaintiff, and Defendant B from May 30, 2013 to May 30, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. The primary defendant is a financial company that operates installment financing business, and the primary defendants entered into an agreement with the main defendant to entrust the operation of installment financing business with the company like the main defendant and operated the automobile installment financing brokerage business.

B. The conjunctive Defendants, as a result of the unreasonable business expansion, were under pressure to repay their obligations, were pretended to lend their names to others and to have been used for personal purposes, such as the repayment of obligations, not for the purchase of used cars, by deeming that they actually purchased a motor vehicle.

C. Around May 2013, Defendant B stated to the Plaintiff that “A preliminary Defendant C created a motor vehicle trading complex with the preliminary Defendant C, and it is necessary to secure a large number of the heavy motor vehicles in advance for the opening of the business. In the event that a motor vehicle registration is lent, the conjunctive Defendants bear all the costs incurred from the acquisition of the motor vehicle, and transfer the vehicle to a used motor vehicle dealer to be established within three months.”

Accordingly, the Plaintiff issued a copy of identification card, a copy of the resident registration certificate issued by the Plaintiff, a certificate of personal seal impression, a certificate of acquisition and loss of the eligibility for health insurance, and a copy of the passbook. After all, the Plaintiff prepared a letter of installment financing, a letter of delegation for payment, a promissory note, and a letter

E. However, at the time of the preliminary Defendant C received a loan under the name of the Plaintiff and purchased the used vehicle with a loan, or transfer the name of the loan to another person within three months, on the ground that the preliminary Defendants were in bad credit standing, and not only did they have no particular property but also had several installment financing loans, and there was no specific way to secure the purchaser who will move the name of the second and second vehicle.