1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.

2. On July 201, 201, the Defendant: (a) on the motor vehicles listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff: (a) around December 27, 2010, when the Defendant purchased the instant automobile as a part of the Plaintiff’s construction around December 27, 2010, and registered one-half shares in title trust to the Plaintiff; (b) the title trust was terminated upon the application for modification of the purport and cause of the claim; (c) the Defendant asserts that the said one-half shares are liable to implement the registration procedure under the name of the Defendant; (d) however, there is no evidence to

Meanwhile, in full view of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 6, the plaintiff and the defendant agreed on July 7, 201 to transfer the title of 1/2 equity in the plaintiff's future while the defendant decided to repay the vehicle loan under the condition that the defendant owns the automobile of this case, while making a divorce on July 7, 2011.

Therefore, pursuant to the above agreement, the defendant is obligated to implement the procedure for transferring the ownership transfer registration to the defendant, among the registration titles of this case, the title of 1/2 shares in the plaintiff future.

Therefore, the plaintiff's conjunctive claim of this case is justified.

2. The plaintiff's main claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the conjunctive claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.