logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.05.11 2016누73544
기타(일반행정)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of some contents and the addition of some contents, and thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act

The following contents shall be added to the second or seventh part of the judgment of the court of first instance:

1. The scope of the judgment of this court was the same as the written claim in the court of first instance, and the court of first instance partially accepted the plaintiff's claim and dismissed the remainder of the claim. Accordingly, only the defendant appealed against the part against which the plaintiff lost, and the plaintiff did not file an appeal. Accordingly, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the part against the defendant. Accordingly, the judgment of this court is limited to the part against the defendant. The judgment of this court is limited to the part against the defendant, " 1." in Part 8 of Part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, " 3.", and " 2." in Part 8 of Part 3, " 3."

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim falling under the scope of this Court's trial should be quoted in its reasoning. Since the part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow