logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.15 2014고단3551
재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one and half years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 6, 2014, at around 00:30, the Defendant damaged the property by putting up steel-proof signboards in the market value, without any reason, at front of the Seoul apartment guard room in the Hanam-si of Gyeonggi-do, and destroying the property by destroying the glass window in the market value with the Defendant’s new launch.

2. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury, deadly weapon, etc.), violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury, deadly weapon, etc.), and the injured defendant committed an injury on the ground that at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), the victim D (the age of 73) who is an apartment security guard of the above apartment is prevented from damaging property, and the victim D (the age of 73) is faced with the right side of the number of days of treatment by pushing the victim D, leading the kne light to the right side of the number of days of treatment, placing the shoulder light, which is a dangerous object of the victim E (the age of 40) who observed and avoided the defendant's assault, and continued to provide the victim with a sign of the bar bar page, which is a dangerous object of the victim E (the age of 40), and two times the victim's chest of the victim E in drinking, and the victim's face and the victim's 5 week face with the victim's face and the victim's 5 week.

3. The Defendant committed an assault on one occasion on the left side of the above H, as he was arrested from the Gyeongnam Police Station G District G District, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report of 112 at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of committing a crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement on H, E, D, and F;

1. Photographss and field photographs of each victim;

1. Investigation report (to hear victim's DNA injuries, photographs of damaged articles, and telephone statement from the victim);

1.The application of the legislation of each injury diagnosis letter.

arrow