logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.11.15 2017나32099
임금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is that of evidence additionally submitted by this court, which is insufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff's assertion, and that of Gap evidence No. 13 and J of the witness at the court of first instance except for addition and modification as follows, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence

The following shall be added at the end of the sixth third day of the first instance judgment:

The following shall be added to the end of the third third part of the judgment of the first instance, "if the workers, including the plaintiff, desire to retire, the F expressed his/her intention to retire, and in addition, the defendant did not submit his/her resignation or retirement."

In relation to this, the following shall be added at the end of the 8th 12 line of the judgment of the first instance, "if the workers desire to retire, the F shall express his intention to retire (the defendant did not submit his resignation or retirement) and the defendant shall be reported to the defendant, but the defendant's intention is not involved in the termination of the labor relations."

The following shall be added at the end of the second half of the judgment of the court of first instance, "If a worker, including the plaintiff, has worked in another company in a month in which the amount of work is small, and he/she has not been removed from the defendant."

In the case of the actual plaintiff, the amount of monthly remuneration of the plaintiff shall be increased by 100,000 won after receiving a request from the defendant for the payment of the plaintiff's remuneration from the defendant and consultation with the rest of the Washington. The amount of monthly remuneration of the plaintiff shall be revised from the third to the nineth to the nineth to the nineth.

In conclusion, the settlement amount distributed by workers in remuneration depends on the total amount of work that can be considered as a result or performance, which shows a significant difference every month, and it reflects the intention of workers through consultation with F even when determining the unit price by item affecting the settlement amount.

arrow