logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.04.03 2013고정4606
관세법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who resides in Uzbekistan Lentent Escand C and visits Korea, and is a person who visits Korea, such as the horses.

Although the name, standard, quantity, price, etc. of domestic goods is reported to the head of the relevant customs office on October 2, 2013, the Defendant, at around 3th of the Incheon International Airport, departing from the Republic of Korea to the Republic of Asia, or the OZ573, at around 14:28, 3rd of the Incheon International Airport, to the Republic of Korea. On October 1, 2013, 2013, the Defendant was found to have been exposed in the process of screening the departure site, i.e., the sum of the market prices, such as Samsung GG ju-si, Samsung LOE EM in the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, 22,165,00 won and the smartphones, as described in the attached list of the 194 points, such as the 194 point in the aggregate of the market prices of Samsung LOE, and carried and exported the smartphones with the deposited goods without filing a report with the head of the relevant customs office

Accordingly, the Defendant attempted to export more than KRW 22,165,00 of the market value and smartphone 194, and attempted to export them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written accusation;

1. Notification of detection;

1. A written appraisal;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Article 271(2), Article 269(3)1, and Article 241(2) of the former Customs Act (Amended by Act No. 12159, Jan. 1, 2014); the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The main sentence of Article 282 (2) of the Customs Act to be confiscated;

1. Article 16 of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that "the act of a person who misleads the misunderstanding that his act does not constitute a crime under the law shall not be punishable only when there is a legitimate ground for misunderstanding" as to the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel pursuant to Article 334 (1) of the Provisional Payment Order. It does not mean a simple legal site, but in general, it is permitted by the law in case of a general crime but in special

arrow