The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant is not the actual employer of the victimized workers, and that the victimized workers would be transferred to F’s employees around May 15, 2014 and paid unpaid wages from F’s company, and thus the Defendant was guilty of the facts charged in this case, even though the Defendant did not have a duty to pay wages. The lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The court below rejected the defendant's assertion and judgment on the lower part of the "a summary of evidence" of the judgment, on the ground that the defendant alleged as the ground for appeal of this case in the court below, and the court below erred by misapprehending the facts as alleged by the defendant and affecting the conclusion of the judgment, and comparing the above judgment with the records, the court below's judgment is just and acceptable.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, among the judgment of the court below, the defendant's partial statement "FFF of the Dispute Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution 1. The defendant's partial statement "No. 1. It is obvious that the defendant's part of the defendant's statement in the first trial record is each clerical error, so it is corrected ex officio in accordance with Article